+- Be Right Back, Uninstalling (https://www.brbuninstalling.com)
+-- Forum: General Category (https://www.brbuninstalling.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=49)
+--- Forum: General Discussion (https://www.brbuninstalling.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=59)
+--- Thread: Why do? (/showthread.php?tid=10332)
Re: Why do? - beep beep diglett - 07-14-2009
(07-14-2009, 02:56 PM)Dave link Wrote: [quote author=Mr. Face link=topic=3278.msg97796#msg97796 date=1247601132]They don't?
[quote author=Dave link=topic=3278.msg97663#msg97663 date=1247593206]
why do humans prefer hot food?
[/quote]
why did humans start cooking food then? and why does eating warm things feel good.
why does warmth feel good?
[/quote]
probably a byproduct of the discovery of fire
and we kept doing it because cooked food is more nutritious, and it tastes better
Re: Why do? - Tragic Hero - 07-14-2009
Well I know back in the day the Romans favored th heavy girls because to be heavy symbolized that you had much wealth.
Re: Why do? - cannedpeahes - 07-14-2009
(07-14-2009, 01:16 PM)Caffeine link Wrote: [quote author=peaches link=topic=3278.msg97681#msg97681 date=1247594307]
In a low-risk environment fat symbolizes the ability to nurture. People who hail from those regions prefer fat people.
In a high-risk environment it betrays vulnerability and the inability to protect offspring. People from those regions prefer skinny people.
Actually these are the opposite, in a high-risk tribal style environment prone to famine, food availability is linked directly to wealth, thus if you are fat/chubby, it means that you are more 'well off' than someone who is skinny.
In a more modern setting, the cheap and more widely available food is more fatty, so if you are poor, you eat food that is worse than you. Odds are as well you might be working much longer hours and not have the time either to exercise or make proper food selections.
[/quote]
When you're comparing a civilised and uncivilised culture this makes sense, but when you're comparing say, civilized Europe and civilized Africa...
Prehistoric Africa and Asia would, I guess you would say, be higher-risk than Europe and South America.
Re: Why do? - at0m - 07-14-2009
(07-14-2009, 04:32 PM)Tragic Hero link Wrote: Well I know back in the day the Romans favored fat women because to be fat meant that you had food to eat and were wealthy.fixed for truth. The same actually applies in areas of Africa even today, not because of ancient tribal custom or evolutionary pressure but because to rapidly lose weight means that you're probably infected with HIV and are starting to collapse from AIDS.
Re: Why do? - Surf314 - 07-14-2009
...every time you are near. Just like me they long to be close to you.
Re: Why do? - Tragic Hero - 07-14-2009
(07-14-2009, 04:35 PM)at0m link Wrote: [quote author=Tragic Hero link=topic=3278.msg97836#msg97836 date=1247607154]fixed for truth. The same actually applies in areas of Africa even today, not because of ancient tribal custom or evolutionary pressure but because to rapidly lose weight means that you're probably infected with HIV and are starting to collapse from AIDS.
Well I know back in the day the Romans favored fat women because to be fat meant that you had food to eat and were wealthy.
[/quote]
I thought thats what my statement implied: That if you were heavy obviously you could afford more food, thus showing wealth. What else could I have meant?
Re: Why do? - Benito Mussolini - 07-14-2009
(07-14-2009, 04:34 PM)peaches link Wrote: [quote author=Caffeine link=topic=3278.msg97689#msg97689 date=1247595364]
[quote author=peaches link=topic=3278.msg97681#msg97681 date=1247594307]
In a low-risk environment fat symbolizes the ability to nurture. People who hail from those regions prefer fat people.
In a high-risk environment it betrays vulnerability and the inability to protect offspring. People from those regions prefer skinny people.
Actually these are the opposite, in a high-risk tribal style environment prone to famine, food availability is linked directly to wealth, thus if you are fat/chubby, it means that you are more 'well off' than someone who is skinny.
In a more modern setting, the cheap and more widely available food is more fatty, so if you are poor, you eat food that is worse than you. Odds are as well you might be working much longer hours and not have the time either to exercise or make proper food selections.
[/quote]
When you're comparing a civilised and uncivilised culture this makes sense, but when you're comparing say, civilized Europe and civilized Africa...
Prehistoric Africa and Asia would, I guess you would say, be higher-risk than Europe and South America.
[/quote]
Tsss
Caff only meant that you inverted the 2.
I didn't even notice until he mentionned it.
You said that in poor countries, the skinnies are beauties, and that in rich countries, the fatties are.
It's actually the opposite... I really believe you made a mistake when writing your first post, otherwise, you would have a point to prove.
Re: Why do? - Wyrmidon - 07-14-2009
(07-14-2009, 04:24 PM)beep beep diglett link Wrote: [quote author=Dave link=topic=3278.msg97799#msg97799 date=1247601385]They don't?
[quote author=Mr. Face link=topic=3278.msg97796#msg97796 date=1247601132]
[quote author=Dave link=topic=3278.msg97663#msg97663 date=1247593206]
why do humans prefer hot food?
[/quote]
why did humans start cooking food then? and why does eating warm things feel good.
why does warmth feel good?
[/quote]
probably a byproduct of the discovery of fire
and we kept doing it because cooked food is more nutritious, and it tastes better
[/quote]
cooking food actually makes it lose nutrients(some ways more than others), but we cook most meat because it gets rid of bacteria that our body can't. also for the taste.
Re: Why do? - copulatingduck - 07-14-2009
Pretty much echoing what caff and tragic said, I know the same was true for India (not sure about now, the country has been changing socially and economically pretty rapidly).
Cooking is more about bacteria.
Most of these questions would better be answered by someone like an anthropologist (yes, like Indiana Jones, but real life anthropology is not nearly as exciting). I don't think these are the sorts of questions geneticists ponder.
Re: Why do? - zaneyard - 07-14-2009
(07-14-2009, 05:19 PM)CopulatingDuck link Wrote: Pretty much echoing what caff and tragic said, I know the same was true for India (not sure about now, the country has been changing socially and economically pretty rapidly).or a sociologist
Cooking is more about bacteria.
Most of these questions would better be answered by someone like an anthropologist (yes, like Indiana Jones, but real life anthropology is not nearly as exciting). I don't think these are the sorts of questions geneticists ponder.
Re: Why do? - Surf314 - 07-14-2009
(07-14-2009, 05:23 PM)zaneyard link Wrote: [quote author=CopulatingDuck link=topic=3278.msg97858#msg97858 date=1247609978]or a sociologist
Pretty much echoing what caff and tragic said, I know the same was true for India (not sure about now, the country has been changing socially and economically pretty rapidly).
Cooking is more about bacteria.
Most of these questions would better be answered by someone like an anthropologist (yes, like Indiana Jones, but real life anthropology is not nearly as exciting). I don't think these are the sorts of questions geneticists ponder.
[/quote]
a socio-anthropologist
Re: Why do? - Benito Mussolini - 07-14-2009
-You'd enjoy hot food if you had snow 4 months every year.
-We find fat people not attractive because that's how the society made us, genetecist wouldn't explain it any better.
-We like having the company of animals because dogs helped us to hunt a lot, and cats helped the Egyptian getting rid of rats.
And people should stop adding thigs every time I hit the Post button.
Re: Why do? - zaneyard - 07-14-2009
(07-14-2009, 05:26 PM)Benito Mussolini link Wrote: And people should stop adding thigs every time I hit the Post button.are you typing anything right now?
Re: Why do? - copulatingduck - 07-14-2009
(07-14-2009, 05:26 PM)Benito Mussolini link Wrote: -We like having the company of animals because dogs helped us to hunt a lot, and cats helped the Egyptian getting rid of rats.
Pretty sure it runs much deeper than that. Maybe in the beginning that's why people adopted animal companions, but (esp. with dogs) the benefits to owning a pet are huge (there are so many positive things that can come from being socially content, one example being the fact that pet owners have exhibited much swifter rehabilitation rates in hospitals)
Re: Why do? - Benito Mussolini - 07-14-2009
(07-14-2009, 05:38 PM)CopulatingDuck link Wrote: [quote author=Benito Mussolini link=topic=3278.msg97865#msg97865 date=1247610409]
-We like having the company of animals because dogs helped us to hunt a lot, and cats helped the Egyptian getting rid of rats.
Pretty sure it runs much deeper than that. Maybe in the beginning that's why people adopted animal companions, but (esp. with dogs) the benefits to owning a pet are huge (there are so many positive things that can come from being socially content, one example being the fact that pet owners have exhibited much swifter rehabilitation rates in hospitals)
[/quote]
Zoophilia.
Re: Why do? - Surf314 - 07-14-2009
What about cryptozoology?
Re: Why do? - Sponson - 07-14-2009
We like animals because we like companions? We're not exactly the HERMIT POKEMON here.
Re: Why do? - Professor Funbucks - 07-14-2009
![[Image: wat-3.jpg]](http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/ll286/Meatshie1d/wat-3.jpg)
i thought I should do this
Re: Why do? - Radio Raheem - 07-14-2009
why dont you and i lyrics sound pretty good to me
Re: Why do? - beep beep diglett - 07-14-2009
(07-14-2009, 06:38 PM)Professor Funbucks link Wrote:
i thought I should do this
why DO we have seasons
it's much simpler to just have a bunch of months