+- Be Right Back, Uninstalling (https://www.brbuninstalling.com)
+-- Forum: Old Boards (https://www.brbuninstalling.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: TF2 (https://www.brbuninstalling.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=45)
+--- Thread: Serious Business: Semi-Casual Amalgamation of Semi-Competitive Players. (/showthread.php?tid=242)
Re: Serious Business: Semi-Casual Amalgamation of Semi-Competitive Players. - Geoff - 05-26-2008
(05-26-2008, 06:59 AM)Kor link Wrote: Workin it, I have to apologize as the Stanley Cup finals is drawing a good portion of my time away.
lulz
Re: Serious Business: Semi-Casual Amalgamation of Semi-Competitive Players. - Surf314 - 05-26-2008
(05-26-2008, 09:58 AM)Geoff link Wrote: [quote author=Kor link=topic=245.msg8416#msg8416 date=1211803190]
Workin it, I have to apologize as the Stanley Cup finals is drawing a good portion of my time away.
lulz
[/quote]
Is that a beer drinking competition
Re: Serious Business: Semi-Casual Amalgamation of Semi-Competitive Players. - rumsfald - 05-26-2008
(05-26-2008, 06:59 AM)Kor link Wrote: I forgot about it since the Stanley Cup finals has my complete attention.
It's ok. We expect that from you northern people.
Re: Serious Business: Semi-Casual Amalgamation of Semi-Competitive Players. - Kor - 05-27-2008
(05-26-2008, 12:10 PM)rumsfald link Wrote: [quote author=Kor link=topic=245.msg8416#msg8416 date=1211803190]
I forgot about it since the Stanley Cup finals has my complete attention.
It's ok. We expect that from you northern people.
[/quote]
Mind your tone good sir, you don't know humility until you've been beaten down with a goalie stick.
Re: Serious Business: Semi-Casual Amalgamation of Semi-Competitive Players. - rumsfald - 05-27-2008
(05-27-2008, 07:17 AM)Kor link Wrote: [quote author=rumsfald link=topic=245.msg8445#msg8445 date=1211821815]
[quote author=Kor link=topic=245.msg8416#msg8416 date=1211803190]
I forgot about it since the Stanley Cup finals has my complete attention.
It's ok. We expect that from you northern people.
[/quote]
Mind your tone good sir, you don't know humility until you've been beaten down with a goalie stick.
[/quote]
Don't go there. You don't want to mess with Ron Hextall when all you got is Eddie Belfour.
Re: Serious Business: Semi-Casual Amalgamation of Semi-Competitive Players. - Kor - 05-28-2008
(05-27-2008, 04:54 PM)rumsfald link Wrote: Don't go there. You don't want to mess with Ron Hextall when all you got is Eddie Belfour.
I'll take your Ron Hextall, and raise you a Steve Smith. He'd wail even on his own teammates.
Re: Serious Business: Semi-Casual Amalgamation of Semi-Competitive Players. - rumsfald - 05-28-2008
(05-28-2008, 07:46 AM)Kor link Wrote: [quote author=rumsfald link=topic=245.msg8628#msg8628 date=1211925272]
Don't go there. You don't want to mess with Ron Hextall when all you got is Eddie Belfour.
I'll take your Ron Hextall, and raise you a Steve Smith. He'd wail even on his own teammates.
[/quote]
I call haX. You said goalie sticks so I stuck with goalies. Had I known you would cheat and leave the crease I woulda picked a Dave Brown or a Tie Domi.
Re: Serious Business: Semi-Casual Amalgamation of Semi-Competitive Players. - Benito Mussolini - 05-28-2008
My turn?
I'd say pro all or average all, but since I have to choose...
Pro: Medic, Random
Works: All the rest
Scrub:
Availability: Whenever I am home, evenings and nights, but all day for weekends
Random = real men's class
Re: Serious Business: Semi-Casual Amalgamation of Semi-Competitive Players. - ZoSo - 05-28-2008
Random means you are too mediocre to be really good.Â
Re: Serious Business: Semi-Casual Amalgamation of Semi-Competitive Players. - cbre88x - 05-29-2008
(05-28-2008, 05:19 PM)ZoSo link Wrote: Random means you are too mediocre to be really good.Â
He's got a mid to high range skill in every class. I've never really seen him dominate in one class, but that's actually a good thing. It seems flexibility goes a long way in this game.
Re: Serious Business: Semi-Casual Amalgamation of Semi-Competitive Players. - ZoSo - 05-29-2008
eh, I was black out when I typed that, haha
8)
Re: Serious Business: Semi-Casual Amalgamation of Semi-Competitive Players. - cbre88x - 05-29-2008
oops :-X
I'm getting pretty anxious waiting for this to happen.
Useless post is useless.
Re: Serious Business: Semi-Casual Amalgamation of Semi-Competitive Players. - Benito Mussolini - 05-29-2008
(05-29-2008, 12:08 AM)cbre88x link Wrote: [quote author=ZoSo link=topic=245.msg8956#msg8956 date=1212013190]
Random means you are too mediocre to be really good.Â
He's got a mid to high range skill in every class. I've never really seen him dominate in one class, but that's actually a good thing. It seems flexibility goes a long way in this game.
[/quote]
Thank you, I'm taking that as a compliment
Edit: Didn't see your last post, Zoso
Re: Serious Business: Semi-Casual Amalgamation of Semi-Competitive Players. - Surf314 - 06-04-2008
OK I know we want to get this thing rolling, so here's my plan. The captain (I'm assuming Kor or Caff) should lock down one of the servers, turn off alltalk and go spec. Then all candidates will join. Then the captain should just observe regular play, re-arrange teams tell people to play certain classes and pair people up as needed, and tell people to join or leave. Based on what they witness and the leaderboards they should be able to gather enough information to start organizing people into tiers.Â
So you have 1st tier for the must haves in a serious match, the 2nd tier for alternates and 3rd tier for people who are good but can't make the time commitment or aren't good enough. 3rd tier will be for the people that can fill up slots if needed or help train or play in non-competitive matches. I'm assuming I'll be in the 3rd tier
.Anyways there's several factors to consider (class specializers vs all around players, team work players vs those that are good alone, etc) but I'm sure Kor, and Caff know what they'd be looking for.
Re: Serious Business: Semi-Casual Amalgamation of Semi-Competitive Players. - rumsfald - 06-04-2008
(06-04-2008, 10:13 AM)Surf314 link Wrote: So you have 1st tier for the must haves in a serious match, the 2nd tier for alternates and 3rd tier for people who are good but can't make the time commitment or aren't good enough. 3rd tier will be for the people that can fill up slots if needed or help train or play in non-competitive matches. I'm assuming I'll be in the 3rd tier
Well, I think that's overcooking it. I think at this point, most TFT/FNF regulars know who the candidates for 1st string are.
After that, it gets mushy between who is 1st string but slips because of schedule, who is a "tweener" but gets bumps because of versatility (or loses points because they are a 1 class wonder). The with the schedules and tweeners the differences between 2nd and 3rd string blurs to moot for me, in terms practicality of organizing a schedule.
At this point, I think it comes down to who do the captains consider being 1st string. In rummy's world, I have more than one player that I put in the top shelf of any given position. If they (the great Captains and Admins and Gods of BRBU) have a good way of determining who is the best (e.g., for sniper Aerox vs. Vandam vs. Zoso; for engineer Kor vs. Joel vs. Greatbacon), so be it. But, if I was in their shoes, I don't necessarily think a 1:1 would tease out which of those should be the absolute #1, nor do I think forced mix-n-match of BRBU regs would yield that info. I think it is far more likely that, on any given scrim date, one or two of the top tier might not be able to make it for the grudge match (that is, the third plus matches of a best of three, assuming Kor sticks to his plan of letting 2nd and 3rd stringers play some in the first 2 of a best out of 3 match) and thus the fine line distinction (who is a 9.6 vs who is a 9.7 on a 10 point scale) is a waste of time trying to figure out.
Re: Serious Business: Semi-Casual Amalgamation of Semi-Competitive Players. - Wedge - 06-04-2008
Indeed.
Re: Serious Business: Semi-Casual Amalgamation of Semi-Competitive Players. - Surf314 - 06-04-2008
Eh my thoughts on the tiers were maybe not explained very well. Since we have so many good players I figured 1st string would be basically the team we use. Second string is the people that are great and could be on the team if there are more slots. These are the people that can fill empties or work their way in to 1st string (maybe they can challenge someone a la afro samurai).
Third string are the people who want to participate but don't belong in the first or second string. These people could be used to help sharpen the 1st and 2nd string in practice and so on. Also for fun we can have BRBU playoffs (as in with other BRBU teams made up of 1st, 2nd and 3rd stringers in equal proportions). This will give all 1st stringers (and maybe some 2nd stringers) leadership experience, plus it'd be a fun thing to do whenever.
Then maybe we could start a new board section just for the 1-3 stringers to talk about strategies and so on. (make it hidden to keep those dirty TC folks from cheating)
But this requires a degree of organization.
Re: Serious Business: Semi-Casual Amalgamation of Semi-Competitive Players. - Vandamguy - 06-04-2008
@rums
i sent a PM to negate telling him that he wins the 'best sniper on the server' award.
87% chance to headshot when i looked.
Re: Serious Business: Semi-Casual Amalgamation of Semi-Competitive Players. - cbre88x - 06-05-2008
(06-04-2008, 10:54 PM)Vandamguy link Wrote: @rums
i sent a PM to negate telling him that he wins the 'best sniper on the server' award.
87% chance to headshot when i looked.
I think you're talking about Versus..he has an .86 HPK, but he doesn't have a lot of statistical padding.
That being said..if I ever see him in a sniper class..I usually try to find him before he finds me. He is insanely good at connecting with the head...no pun intended.
Re: Serious Business: Semi-Casual Amalgamation of Semi-Competitive Players. - Vandamguy - 06-05-2008
(06-05-2008, 12:07 AM)cbre88x link Wrote: [quote author=Vandamguy link=topic=245.msg10359#msg10359 date=1212638097]
@rums
i sent a PM to negate telling him that he wins the 'best sniper on the server' award.
87% chance to headshot when i looked.
I think you're talking about Versus..he has an .86 HPK, but he doesn't have a lot of statistical padding.
That being said..if I ever see him in a sniper class..I usually try to find him before he finds me. He is insanely good at connecting with the head...no pun intended.
[/quote]
not headshots per kill
percentage of kills that are headshot.
sniper rifle kills divided by headshot kills