Has anyone else seen this? (Official lulz thread) - Printable Version +- Be Right Back, Uninstalling (https://www.brbuninstalling.com) +-- Forum: General Category (https://www.brbuninstalling.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=49) +--- Forum: General Discussion (https://www.brbuninstalling.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=59) +--- Thread: Has anyone else seen this? (Official lulz thread) (/showthread.php?tid=7170) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
|
Re: Has anyone else seen this? (Official lulz thread) - Spore - 10-11-2010 (10-11-2010, 11:21 AM)Squishy link Wrote: [quote author=Kirby, the AxeHammer Zealot link=topic=52.msg178105#msg178105 date=1286806115] [/quote]i like how that version of the code is wrong, gg whoever contributed that to wikipedia [/quote] Care to tell us what the real Konami Code is, because I'm pretty sure that's right. Re: Has anyone else seen this? (Official lulz thread) - CaffeinePowered - 10-11-2010 (10-11-2010, 11:38 AM)Spore link Wrote: [quote author=Squishy link=topic=52.msg178115#msg178115 date=1286814093] [/quote]i like how that version of the code is wrong, gg whoever contributed that to wikipedia [/quote] Care to tell us what the real Konami Code is, because I'm pretty sure that's right. [/quote] In the context of Contra, it would end in Start or Select then Start, but thats just arguing semantics , get back to lulz :-* Re: Has anyone else seen this? (Official lulz thread) - Kirby - 10-11-2010 (10-11-2010, 11:42 AM)Caffeine link Wrote: [quote author=Spore link=topic=52.msg178121#msg178121 date=1286815130] [/quote]i like how that version of the code is wrong, gg whoever contributed that to wikipedia [/quote] Care to tell us what the real Konami Code is, because I'm pretty sure that's right. [/quote] In the context of Contra, it would end in Start or Select then Start, but thats just arguing semantics , get back to lulz :-* [/quote] I'm playing Contra on break at work on my laptop with my USB NES controller. I love emulators. Re: Has anyone else seen this? (Official lulz thread) - Spore - 10-11-2010 (10-11-2010, 11:42 AM)Caffeine link Wrote: [quote author=Spore link=topic=52.msg178121#msg178121 date=1286815130] [/quote]i like how that version of the code is wrong, gg whoever contributed that to wikipedia [/quote] Care to tell us what the real Konami Code is, because I'm pretty sure that's right. [/quote] In the context of Contra, it would end in Start or Select then Start, but thats just arguing semantics , get back to lulz :-* [/quote] Even in the context of Contra, the Konami code is still as posted. The start and select are just to begin the game and have no bearing on the code itself. Let's say there is a code where you need to pause the game first before entering it in. If you were telling the code to your friends, you wouldn't mention that you need to press Start once you're done to unpause the game. That's silly. Now we may return to the lulz. Derp Symphony Re: Has anyone else seen this? (Official lulz thread) - Dtrain323i - 10-11-2010 Ad for Canal +: March of the Penguins Re: Has anyone else seen this? (Official lulz thread) - Kirby - 10-11-2010 (10-11-2010, 02:13 PM)Spore link Wrote: [quote author=Caffeine link=topic=52.msg178124#msg178124 date=1286815357] [/quote]i like how that version of the code is wrong, gg whoever contributed that to wikipedia [/quote] Care to tell us what the real Konami Code is, because I'm pretty sure that's right. [/quote] In the context of Contra, it would end in Start or Select then Start, but thats just arguing semantics , get back to lulz :-* [/quote] Even in the context of Contra, the Konami code is still as posted. The start and select are just to begin the game and have no bearing on the code itself. Let's say there is a code where you need to pause the game first before entering it in. If you were telling the code to your friends, you wouldn't mention that you need to press Start once you're done to unpause the game. That's silly. Now we may return to the lulz. [/quote] Now I'm going to get REALLY nitpicky here, but the select part in Contra was actually part of the code, for 2P. :-X Re: Has anyone else seen this? (Official lulz thread) - Ianki - 10-11-2010 (10-11-2010, 08:20 AM)Caffeine link Wrote: Someone please remind me why anyone bought SC2? I would like to take this time to remind you that valve routinely suspends or bans users who use third party apps to alter game play. Blizzard gave fair warning over a month ago that they were going to ban people for using programs like these, even for offline play, and if you were to do such a thing, to do so at their own risks. Not only can you use programmed cheats during single player, you can also use the map editor to create any unfair advantage against a computer you could want. This wasn't in the fine print of some amazingly dense ToS, people knew they could get banned for this. They have no moral high ground here for a game where online cheating is a problem and ruins competition and fun and are in fact silly for believing they would be exempt or that blizzards detection software can root out the difference between a single player and multi-player program when both are essentially doing the same things. Re: Has anyone else seen this? (Official lulz thread) - CaffeinePowered - 10-11-2010 (10-11-2010, 03:13 PM)Ianki link Wrote: I would like to take this time to remind you that valve routinely suspends or bans users who use third party apps to alter game play. Valve does not ban people from using any sort of trainer in single player move, and technically you wouldn't need to since you have full console access to the game and can modify any in game cvar with out the use of a memory editor. You will get banned, and rightly so, for using any sort of trainer in an online multiplayer game. VAC Bans also apply only to that particular game (ex. banned from CSS, not TF2). Very rarely in cases of fraud and phishing will valve completely lock or ban a steam account. Furthermore, the decision to even use VAC is solely in the hands of multiplayer server operators, valve does not scan your computer looking to see if you are hacking. There are servers that have VAC turned off, I could go use any hack I wanted on them without fear of the Valve Ban Hammer locking me out of all servers. Just because you bury something in the EULA does not necessarily make it legal either. To show how few people read the EULA I could write, "by installing this software you agree to send me an extra $1000", and no court is going to uphold that. Recently the supreme court ruled that apple could not stifle people who circumvented and hacked iPhones and iPods, its your hardware you can do whatever you want with it. While this is in relation to hardware and not software, I believe it applies as well in a sense. What sort of reasonable expectations do I have in regards to modifying the software after I have it? I would argue you have a pretty large leeway to do whatever the heck you want with it provided that you don't ruin anyone else's online experience. Blizzard's reason for the ban? The achievements are "online prestige you did not fairly earn", give me a break, just reset their achievements and lock them from ever having them. For all the bitching, this makes Valve's handling of hat idlers look gentlemanly, they just took back the hats people got unfairly and that was that. </rant> (this might be a discussion to separate in another thread if people want to continue it) Re: Has anyone else seen this? (Official lulz thread) - Spore - 10-11-2010 (10-11-2010, 03:02 PM)Kirby, the AxeHammer Zealot link Wrote: [quote author=Spore link=topic=52.msg178140#msg178140 date=1286824415] [/quote]i like how that version of the code is wrong, gg whoever contributed that to wikipedia [/quote] Care to tell us what the real Konami Code is, because I'm pretty sure that's right. [/quote] In the context of Contra, it would end in Start or Select then Start, but thats just arguing semantics , get back to lulz :-* [/quote] Even in the context of Contra, the Konami code is still as posted. The start and select are just to begin the game and have no bearing on the code itself. Let's say there is a code where you need to pause the game first before entering it in. If you were telling the code to your friends, you wouldn't mention that you need to press Start once you're done to unpause the game. That's silly. Now we may return to the lulz. [/quote] Now I'm going to get REALLY nitpicky here, but the select part in Contra was actually part of the code, for 2P. :-X [/quote] Not true. Start up Contra, and begin by pressing select to highlight 2 player, then enter the code and hit start. It still works despite pressing select before entering the code. WHAT NOW?! Re: Has anyone else seen this? (Official lulz thread) - Squishy3 - 10-11-2010 Re: Has anyone else seen this? (Official lulz thread) - Luinbariel - 10-11-2010 OMG DURRR Re: Has anyone else seen this? (Official lulz thread) - Spore - 10-11-2010 Probably one of the best commercials. Super Meat Boy 80's Commercial Trailer HD Re: Has anyone else seen this? (Official lulz thread) - Ianki - 10-11-2010 a classic retelling of this: Re: Has anyone else seen this? (Official lulz thread) - Ianki - 10-11-2010 also: a job i could do. Re: Has anyone else seen this? (Official lulz thread) - [SiN] Merc - 10-11-2010 "If a tree falls in a forest, and no one's there, does it make a sound?" answered in Team Fortress 2 Re: Has anyone else seen this? (Official lulz thread) - Wyrmidon - 10-11-2010 OH shit That is awesome Mrec. Re: Has anyone else seen this? (Official lulz thread) - beep beep diglett - 10-12-2010 Axe Cop Episode ONE watch them all Re: Has anyone else seen this? (Official lulz thread) - Didzo - 10-12-2010 (10-12-2010, 12:45 AM)dagrett link Wrote: Axe Cop Episode ONE Coauthored by diglett and tardle. Re: Has anyone else seen this? (Official lulz thread) - beep beep diglett - 10-12-2010 (10-12-2010, 01:37 AM)Didzo link Wrote: [quote author=dagrett link=topic=52.msg178231#msg178231 date=1286862356] Coauthored by pyrozombie [/quote] ftfy, you're welcome! Re: Has anyone else seen this? (Official lulz thread) - chronomaster - 10-12-2010 Quote: Merc link=topic=52.msg178206#msg178206 date=1286850069]Proving that anyone discussing science in a Westminster accent is instantly funny in direct proportion to how serious it is. |