s0lesurviv0r N00b Posts: 43 Joined: Jun 2008 |
09-08-2008, 12:44 AM
Currently my pc has an 80gig(for vista and essential stuff) and a 250gig(games, media, pron etc). But I've been contemplating taking the larger drive out and setting up a 2 drive raid(the egg is selling hitachi 500 gigs for 55 after rebate, WD640's look tempting also but a tad more expensive), then after transferring stuff from said drive to raid using it as an external (already bought an antec enclosure for cheap). I'm wondering what I should know before I venture into this, my 650 power supply won't buckle under the pressure will it, will transferring files be as easy as swapping the original drive in the enclosure and drag+dropping in windows? Please enlighten me.
|
||
|
Mission Difficult BRB, Posting Posts: 1,771 Joined: Mar 2008 |
09-08-2008, 12:46 AM
Do you want redundancy or higher bandwidth?
|
||
|
s0lesurviv0r N00b Posts: 43 Joined: Jun 2008 |
09-08-2008, 08:30 AM
I'm going for bandwidth (um, that would be striping, right?) since I'll be using the 250gig as an external/backup.
|
||
|
zaneyard Made with Whole Gainz (tm) Posts: 6,930 Joined: Jun 2008 |
09-08-2008, 09:58 AM
(09-08-2008, 08:30 AM)s0lesurviv0r link Wrote: I'm going for bandwidth (um, that would be striping, right?) since I'll be using the 250gig as an external/backup.raid 0 (04-09-2013, 11:24 PM)Dr. Zaius link Wrote:well i'm not really understanding how it's faster internet. and like google just magically rolls outs this stuff and it's 100 times faster than my internet? why? that doesn't set off any alarms to anyone? (11-07-2012, 11:15 PM)at0m link Wrote:I MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE OVERINDULGED ON RUM AND COKES AT OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE |
||
|
CaffeinePowered Mad Hatter Posts: 12,998 Joined: Mar 2008 |
09-08-2008, 12:00 PM
(09-08-2008, 08:30 AM)s0lesurviv0r link Wrote: I'm going for bandwidth (um, that would be striping, right?) since I'll be using the 250gig as an external/backup. Raid 0 = bandwidth Raid 1 = redundancy Raid 5 = both Go for 5 if at all possible  Sig by Joel |
||
|
HeK Rotartsinimda Posts: 4,183 Joined: Jun 2015 |
09-08-2008, 01:08 PM
(09-08-2008, 12:00 PM)CaffeinePowered link Wrote: Raid 0 = bandwidth There is also RAID 2, 3, 4, 6 and various levels of nested arrays. RAID 2, 3, and 4 are pretty much pointless with RAID 5 and 6. RAID 6 is similar to RAID 5 (striping with parity) but employs two copies of the parity information. The idea is that when a RAID 5 array is in a degraded state, you suffer an immense performance hit. Additionally, due to manufacturing tolerances, by the time a single drive fails in a array, the other drives are close to their limit as well. I've read that there is a 70% chance of a second drive failing while rebuilding a RAID 5 array, corrupting all data. RAID 6 addresses that by giving you a two-disc failure tolerance. Really with the price of discs, a nested RAID 1+0 is the best design. It's basically a stripe of mirrors. |
||
|
s0lesurviv0r N00b Posts: 43 Joined: Jun 2008 |
09-08-2008, 03:02 PM
I thought you would need more than 2 drives to do RAID 5.
|
||
|
Mission Difficult BRB, Posting Posts: 1,771 Joined: Mar 2008 |
09-08-2008, 03:06 PM
(09-08-2008, 03:02 PM)s0lesurviv0r link Wrote: I thought you would need more than 2 drives to do RAID 5.You need at least 3. |
||
|
copulatingduck Following in Gordon's Footsteps Posts: 7,518 Joined: Apr 2008 |
09-08-2008, 03:20 PM
(09-08-2008, 12:44 AM)s0lesurviv0r link Wrote: Currently my pc has an 80gig(for vista and essential stuff) and a 250gig(games, media, pron etc). But I've been contemplating taking the larger drive out and setting up a 2 drive raid(the egg is selling hitachi 500 gigs for 55 after rebate, WD640's look tempting also but a tad more expensive), then after transferring stuff from said drive to raid using it as an external (already bought an antec enclosure for cheap). I'm wondering what I should know before I venture into this, my 650 power supply won't buckle under the pressure will it, will transferring files be as easy as swapping the original drive in the enclosure and drag+dropping in windows? Please enlighten me. omg don't get hitachi's! idk what other people's experience with them is, but they're not nicked "hitachi deathstars" for nothing. Go with wd or seagate. Your data sounds like it's important to you, don't cheap out on one of the most important pieces of hardware. :-\ Also, just emphasizing the obvious: if you raid larger drives with smaller ones, it's going to look like you have [b]n of the smallest drives, ie the smallest drive is going to be your limiting factor. Ripped like paper raped with ease hey scrub nerd pyros suck on these |
||
|
Mission Difficult BRB, Posting Posts: 1,771 Joined: Mar 2008 |
09-08-2008, 03:33 PM
RAID's perform best if they're homogeneous, i.e. all drives are the exact same make and model. A heterogeneous RAID will work, but will take a performance hit. I also second Seagate drives. Had some bad experiences with Hitachi.
|
||
|
Dave White Lighting - Extra 50% Free Posts: 4,177 Joined: Jun 2008 |
09-08-2008, 03:38 PM
|
||
|
Mission Difficult BRB, Posting Posts: 1,771 Joined: Mar 2008 |
09-08-2008, 03:46 PM
(09-08-2008, 03:38 PM)Dave link Wrote: [quote author=Mission Difficult link=topic=1364.msg37336#msg37336 date=1220906024] wat? [/quote] Kind of like how ancient Greek armies would use the gay relationships between soldiers to boost their moral and bravery. |
||
|
KorJax BRB, Posting Posts: 1,376 Joined: Jun 2008 |
09-09-2008, 02:37 PM
(09-08-2008, 03:46 PM)Mission Difficult link Wrote: [quote author=Dave link=topic=1364.msg37337#msg37337 date=1220906288] wat? [/quote] Kind of like how ancient Greek armies would use the gay relationships between soldiers to boost their moral and bravery. [/quote] Fuckin' hot |
||
|
|