Neonie Guest |
06-25-2008, 10:10 PM
(06-25-2008, 09:55 PM)Eschatos link Wrote: Also some of you guys are fail for not picking actual weapons. I agree with this |
||
|
exanimo Guest |
06-26-2008, 12:04 AM
(06-25-2008, 05:45 PM)rumsfald link Wrote: Weapon: Nike Airs.I gave more thought to it. I am having doubts as to whether or not Rumsfald could even outrun Steven Hawking, even with Nike Airs.[ |
||
|
A. Crow Surprise Whopper Posts: 4,091 Joined: May 2008 |
06-26-2008, 12:22 AM
I've put a disturbing amount of thought into this already. Â I have one of the few zombie defensible apartments off campus here (the entire university is... well it's a fucking snipers dream, assuming no one in your dorm infested you're set.) because I have a totally destructible staircase leading to my door. Â But this is in a mall, still, Imma stick to the plan.
1. I already have the 12 gauge Remington Wingmaster sitting in my closet, I'd just need a large amount of shot. 2. Anything by Black Sabbath would do, but I think "Lord of this World" would be most fitting. 3. This has never really come into any of my plans. Â Steven Colbert to report on my victory? |
||
|
Greatbacon The Most Delicious of All Meats Posts: 1,980 Joined: Mar 2008 |
06-26-2008, 12:28 AM
1.) Swords don't run out of ammo.
2.) VNV Nation - Honour 3.) White Mage from FF1 |
||
|
Yomanz Lurker Posts: 111 Joined: Apr 2008 |
06-26-2008, 12:40 AM
1. A 12 gauge pump action shotgun. Classic anti-zombie weapon.
2. I must second dave and go with "Down with the Sickness" by disturbed. Â ;D 3. Hmm...i honestly dunno anyone famous who i would want to fight alongside me. But if i can substitute the "fame" factor with "more than one person" i'd say two of my good friends. Between us we have enough weapons to wage world war 3 (One of my friends is the heir to a gun store which will serve as our personal armory/fortress, not to mention weapons we already personally own). I also forgot to mention that we've spent countless hours coming up with plans for the inevitable zombie infestation. I could talk for hours about these plans but i'll refrain from doing so. Nonetheless, i think it's safe to say that we WILL be prepared. Â |
||
|
A. Crow Surprise Whopper Posts: 4,091 Joined: May 2008 |
06-26-2008, 12:45 AM
(06-26-2008, 12:40 AM)Yomanz link Wrote: 1. A 12 gauge pump action shotgun. Classic anti-zombie weapon. While your music choice is solid, I still must emphasize the awe in which I just listened to Lord of this World in a zombie apocalypse context. I also applaud your forward thinking and preparedness for already having a zombie apocalypse plan on the books. I'd also like to take this opportunity to rag on the "bladed weapon X" people. A zombification inducing pathogen would most likely be blood borne, do you really want to be close enough to engage in honorable combat? Shotguns would at least direct the majority of the spray out radially from you.Â
(This post was last modified: 06-26-2008, 12:48 AM by A. Crow.)
|
||
|
Vandamguy Guest |
06-26-2008, 12:47 AM
1: Belmont family whip , requires no explaination. shame on the rest of you for not thinking of it.
2: Children of bodom - triple corpse hammerblow. 3: McGuyver. You need to be able to improvise in a survival situation. d: psp would be in my pocket at the time of the event. it has a 4gb Memorystick , loaded with porn. |
||
|
Dave White Lighting - Extra 50% Free Posts: 4,177 Joined: Jun 2008 |
06-26-2008, 05:46 AM
(06-26-2008, 12:45 AM)A. Crow link Wrote: [quote author=Yomanz link=topic=640.msg16105#msg16105 date=1214458815] Blades dont need reloading, also i would beavoiding zombies on the whole; scavenging for supplies, having post apocolyptic sex making cool power ranger noises as i swing my katana around, so good times were had by all. While your music choice is solid, I still must emphasize the awe in which I just listened to Lord of this World in a zombie apocalypse context. I also applaud your forward thinking and preparedness for already having a zombie apocalypse plan on the books. I'd also like to take this opportunity to rag on the "bladed weapon X" people. A zombification inducing pathogen would most likely be blood borne, do you really want to be close enough to engage in honorable combat? Shotguns would at least direct the majority of the spray out radially from you. [/quote] |
||
|
Fozy N00b Posts: 22 Joined: Jun 2008 |
06-26-2008, 07:01 AM
1. Lawn Mower Dead alive style.
2. Peanut butter Jelly time. 3. Bob Barker Because he will never die. |
||
|
Negate Born the same day as Linux... poor guy.. Posts: 766 Joined: Apr 2008 |
06-26-2008, 08:27 AM
(06-25-2008, 06:33 PM)Luca Shoal link Wrote: I lol'd Trace. Ilu <3.You know you want a sentry luca 8) Your in the minority, its supposed to taste like a shit taco Jon Stewart [move]ii@.[/move] |
||
|
Kor Crits = Skill Posts: 1,654 Joined: Mar 2008 |
06-26-2008, 10:07 AM
1. A Green Lantern ring.
2. Champagne - 311 3. Ghandi. Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence. -Albert Einstein |
||
|
Tragic Hero Too Asexual For A Custom Title Posts: 1,656 Joined: Apr 2008 |
06-26-2008, 06:05 PM
(06-26-2008, 12:45 AM)A. Crow link Wrote: [quote author=Yomanz link=topic=640.msg16105#msg16105 date=1214458815] While your music choice is solid, I still must emphasize the awe in which I just listened to Lord of this World in a zombie apocalypse context. I also applaud your forward thinking and preparedness for already having a zombie apocalypse plan on the books. I'd also like to take this opportunity to rag on the "bladed weapon X" people. A zombification inducing pathogen would most likely be blood borne, do you really want to be close enough to engage in honorable combat? Shotguns would at least direct the majority of the spray out radially from you.  [/quote] Good point. Also, unless you are master swordsman AND pretty strong, your blade is most likely going to get stuck within a zombie. So you would have to use extra effort to withdraw blade/sword from zombie and swing it to attack another one closing in. Thats why I go for the sledgehammer. If I can't kill a zombie with one hit at least I can cripple it one way or another. |
||
|
Luinbariel Snailcat ..@:3 Posts: 4,520 Joined: Jun 2008 |
06-26-2008, 08:02 PM
(06-26-2008, 06:05 PM)Tragic Hero link Wrote: [quote author=A. Crow link=topic=640.msg16107#msg16107 date=1214459140] While your music choice is solid, I still must emphasize the awe in which I just listened to Lord of this World in a zombie apocalypse context. I also applaud your forward thinking and preparedness for already having a zombie apocalypse plan on the books. I'd also like to take this opportunity to rag on the "bladed weapon X" people. A zombification inducing pathogen would most likely be blood borne, do you really want to be close enough to engage in honorable combat? Shotguns would at least direct the majority of the spray out radially from you. [/quote] Good point. Also, unless you are master swordsman AND pretty strong, your blade is most likely going to get stuck within a zombie. So you would have to use extra effort to withdraw blade/sword from zombie and swing it to attack another one closing in. Thats why I go for the sledgehammer. If I can't kill a zombie with one hit at least I can cripple it one way or another. [/quote] But the sledgehammer could be pretty damn slow; one good smash takes two hands, at least for me, and more than a few seconds; by the time I've smashed one skull, four more are going to be cleaning out mine. |
||
|
rumsfald Guest |
06-26-2008, 08:20 PM
|
||
|
NiceGuy Fulfills Asi^H^H Korean stereotypes Posts: 554 Joined: May 2008 |
06-26-2008, 08:35 PM
(06-26-2008, 08:02 PM)Luinbariel link Wrote: [quote author=Tragic Hero link=topic=640.msg16296#msg16296 date=1214521552] While your music choice is solid, I still must emphasize the awe in which I just listened to Lord of this World in a zombie apocalypse context. I also applaud your forward thinking and preparedness for already having a zombie apocalypse plan on the books. I'd also like to take this opportunity to rag on the "bladed weapon X" people. A zombification inducing pathogen would most likely be blood borne, do you really want to be close enough to engage in honorable combat? Shotguns would at least direct the majority of the spray out radially from you.  [/quote] Good point. Also, unless you are master swordsman AND pretty strong, your blade is most likely going to get stuck within a zombie. So you would have to use extra effort to withdraw blade/sword from zombie and swing it to attack another one closing in. Thats why I go for the sledgehammer. If I can't kill a zombie with one hit at least I can cripple it one way or another. [/quote] But the sledgehammer could be pretty damn slow; one good smash takes two hands, at least for me, and more than a few seconds; by the time I've smashed one skull, four more are going to be cleaning out mine. [/quote] Especially if the zombies are of the 28 days/weeks later variety. Them suckers are fast. On BAL-SACKs: (07-10-2008, 06:52 PM)rumsfald link Wrote:Like our namesake, the number one thing we do is hang around. Between your legs. Hang around waiting for some action. |
||
|
Dave White Lighting - Extra 50% Free Posts: 4,177 Joined: Jun 2008 |
06-26-2008, 08:42 PM
Thoose mother suckers.
|
||
|
Yomanz Lurker Posts: 111 Joined: Apr 2008 |
06-26-2008, 09:01 PM
(06-26-2008, 08:02 PM)Luinbariel link Wrote: [quote author=Tragic Hero link=topic=640.msg16296#msg16296 date=1214521552] While your music choice is solid, I still must emphasize the awe in which I just listened to Lord of this World in a zombie apocalypse context. I also applaud your forward thinking and preparedness for already having a zombie apocalypse plan on the books. I'd also like to take this opportunity to rag on the "bladed weapon X" people. A zombification inducing pathogen would most likely be blood borne, do you really want to be close enough to engage in honorable combat? Shotguns would at least direct the majority of the spray out radially from you.  [/quote] Good point. Also, unless you are master swordsman AND pretty strong, your blade is most likely going to get stuck within a zombie. So you would have to use extra effort to withdraw blade/sword from zombie and swing it to attack another one closing in. Thats why I go for the sledgehammer. If I can't kill a zombie with one hit at least I can cripple it one way or another. [/quote] But the sledgehammer could be pretty damn slow; one good smash takes two hands, at least for me, and more than a few seconds; by the time I've smashed one skull, four more are going to be cleaning out mine. [/quote] I dunno, i'd probably use my katana along with the shotgun, but only if i didn't have the time to reload my shotty. Also whenever i'd have a break from fighting, i'd be sure to sharpen my katana so that it couldn't get stuck in a zombie so as to avoid the problem tragic was talking about. Even if your not strong, keeping the blade sharp would make up for that. As for skill...well it's hard to say. Against one zombie it wouldn't matter too much. Against more, you'd better hope that you have some experience with a blade. At any rate, close combat with a zombie is normally something you'd want to avoid if at all possible. :o |
||
|
Tragic Hero Too Asexual For A Custom Title Posts: 1,656 Joined: Apr 2008 |
06-26-2008, 09:06 PM
(06-26-2008, 08:35 PM)NiceGuy link Wrote: [quote author=Luinbariel link=topic=640.msg16333#msg16333 date=1214528523] While your music choice is solid, I still must emphasize the awe in which I just listened to Lord of this World in a zombie apocalypse context. I also applaud your forward thinking and preparedness for already having a zombie apocalypse plan on the books. I'd also like to take this opportunity to rag on the "bladed weapon X" people. A zombification inducing pathogen would most likely be blood borne, do you really want to be close enough to engage in honorable combat? Shotguns would at least direct the majority of the spray out radially from you.  [/quote] Good point. Also, unless you are master swordsman AND pretty strong, your blade is most likely going to get stuck within a zombie. So you would have to use extra effort to withdraw blade/sword from zombie and swing it to attack another one closing in. Thats why I go for the sledgehammer. If I can't kill a zombie with one hit at least I can cripple it one way or another. [/quote] But the sledgehammer could be pretty damn slow; one good smash takes two hands, at least for me, and more than a few seconds; by the time I've smashed one skull, four more are going to be cleaning out mine. [/quote] Especially if the zombies are of the 28 days/weeks later variety. Them suckers are fast. [/quote] Massive Quote! Anyways, valid point on the speed of the sledge. Might have to change mine to a War Mace or something like that. And 28 days later it wasn't zombies. Those were infected people. Yeah I know they could be considered the same thing but I believe we are talking about the slow, shambling type. If any of us were stuck in a mall full of 28 days later infected humans I don't think anyone would have a chance. Even with Iron Mans suit. |
||
|
Luinbariel Snailcat ..@:3 Posts: 4,520 Joined: Jun 2008 |
06-26-2008, 09:26 PM
(06-26-2008, 09:06 PM)Tragic Hero link Wrote: [quote author=NiceGuy link=topic=640.msg16342#msg16342 date=1214530552] While your music choice is solid, I still must emphasize the awe in which I just listened to Lord of this World in a zombie apocalypse context. I also applaud your forward thinking and preparedness for already having a zombie apocalypse plan on the books. I'd also like to take this opportunity to rag on the "bladed weapon X" people. A zombification inducing pathogen would most likely be blood borne, do you really want to be close enough to engage in honorable combat? Shotguns would at least direct the majority of the spray out radially from you. [/quote] Good point. Also, unless you are master swordsman AND pretty strong, your blade is most likely going to get stuck within a zombie. So you would have to use extra effort to withdraw blade/sword from zombie and swing it to attack another one closing in. Thats why I go for the sledgehammer. If I can't kill a zombie with one hit at least I can cripple it one way or another. [/quote] But the sledgehammer could be pretty damn slow; one good smash takes two hands, at least for me, and more than a few seconds; by the time I've smashed one skull, four more are going to be cleaning out mine. [/quote] Especially if the zombies are of the 28 days/weeks later variety. Them suckers are fast. [/quote] Massive Quote! Anyways, valid point on the speed of the sledge. Might have to change mine to a War Mace or something like that. And 28 days later it wasn't zombies. Those were infected people. Yeah I know they could be considered the same thing but I believe we are talking about the slow, shambling type. If any of us were stuck in a mall full of 28 days later infected humans I don't think anyone would have a chance. Even with Iron Mans suit. [/quote] If these were infected from 28 Days Later, I would have to revise my list; 1. A handgun. 2. A dirge 3. Someone to bury my corpse, as I would simply off myself. |
||
|
A. Crow Surprise Whopper Posts: 4,091 Joined: May 2008 |
06-27-2008, 12:18 AM
(06-26-2008, 09:26 PM)Luinbariel link Wrote: [quote author=Tragic Hero link=topic=640.msg16353#msg16353 date=1214532372] While your music choice is solid, I still must emphasize the awe in which I just listened to Lord of this World in a zombie apocalypse context. I also applaud your forward thinking and preparedness for already having a zombie apocalypse plan on the books. I'd also like to take this opportunity to rag on the "bladed weapon X" people. A zombification inducing pathogen would most likely be blood borne, do you really want to be close enough to engage in honorable combat? Shotguns would at least direct the majority of the spray out radially from you.  [/quote] Good point. Also, unless you are master swordsman AND pretty strong, your blade is most likely going to get stuck within a zombie. So you would have to use extra effort to withdraw blade/sword from zombie and swing it to attack another one closing in. Thats why I go for the sledgehammer. If I can't kill a zombie with one hit at least I can cripple it one way or another. [/quote] But the sledgehammer could be pretty damn slow; one good smash takes two hands, at least for me, and more than a few seconds; by the time I've smashed one skull, four more are going to be cleaning out mine. [/quote] Especially if the zombies are of the 28 days/weeks later variety. Them suckers are fast. [/quote] Massive Quote! Anyways, valid point on the speed of the sledge. Might have to change mine to a War Mace or something like that. And 28 days later it wasn't zombies. Those were infected people. Yeah I know they could be considered the same thing but I believe we are talking about the slow, shambling type. If any of us were stuck in a mall full of 28 days later infected humans I don't think anyone would have a chance. Even with Iron Mans suit. [/quote] If these were infected from 28 Days Later, I would have to revise my list; 1. A handgun. 2. A dirge 3. Someone to bury my corpse, as I would simply off myself. [/quote] Oh yes, it goes on. We have a pessimist among us. I had 3 years of USMC influence from high school + the Naval Science minor in college, I believe that I'll survive through superior planning/tactics/force no matter the situation, it's been drilled into my psyche. In the event of "fast movers" I'd require A) Riot gear & shield B) The Mobility Denial System in concert with my shotgun. Also, do pornstars count as acceptable answers for part 3?
(This post was last modified: 06-27-2008, 12:27 AM by A. Crow.)
|
||
|
|