Surf314 Seriously, this week I'll play PS Posts: 12,078 Joined: Mar 2008 |
08-01-2008, 11:01 AM
Yea I wasn't saying it was an absolute, but a trend that holds up enough that it would serve the purposes that people have been bitching about. That they want a server they can have fun on with mostly the community and that they don't want to be exclusive. If we keep #1 customs it will attract more serious gamers and community members are already attracted to it. If we follow this up by policing #2 better will create the perfect community setup. #2 to introduce us to new people, #1 to keep them interested and around (and having fun).
|
||
|
Budr Guest |
08-01-2008, 11:46 AM
(08-01-2008, 10:31 AM)CaffeinePowered link Wrote: I don't believe thats true at all, the elitism that is. Affecting a tongue-in-cheek tone when typing is serious business. I was only messing cos I've been pretty vocal about preferring stocks. Regarding the main point, I was more suggesting that, once #1 is all-custom, #2 could be a vanilla, stock-only server (possibly sans Granary). I really miss Badlands and Hydro. Plus I've only been on ctf_well once since the update and thought it was really nice but never gets played. |
||
|
Eschatos Jack Thompson Fan Club Member Posts: 4,447 Joined: Mar 2008 |
08-01-2008, 11:52 AM
(08-01-2008, 11:46 AM)Budr link Wrote: [quote author=CaffeinePowered link=topic=1020.msg26666#msg26666 date=1217604671] Affecting a tongue-in-cheek tone when typing is serious business. I was only messing cos I've been pretty vocal about preferring stocks. Regarding the main point, I was more suggesting that, once #1 is all-custom, #2 could be a vanilla, stock-only server (possibly sans Granary). I really miss Badlands and Hydro. Plus I've only been on ctf_well once since the update and thought it was really nice but never gets played. [/quote] Agreed. More badlands and hydro plz. |
||
|
copulatingduck Following in Gordon's Footsteps Posts: 7,518 Joined: Apr 2008 |
08-01-2008, 11:57 AM
(08-01-2008, 11:46 AM)Budr link Wrote: [quote author=CaffeinePowered link=topic=1020.msg26666#msg26666 date=1217604671] Affecting a tongue-in-cheek tone when typing is serious business. I was only messing cos I've been pretty vocal about preferring stocks. Regarding the main point, I was more suggesting that, once #1 is all-custom, #2 could be a vanilla, stock-only server (possibly sans Granary). I really miss Badlands and Hydro. Plus I've only been on ctf_well once since the update and thought it was really nice but never gets played. [/quote] If anything, it would be sans ctf_well. I happen to like granary >, it's at least better than ctf_well action-wise imho. And from what I've seen, Fastlane is just a Hydro-looking version of Granary in that whomever gets the middle point in pub play always wins. Ripped like paper raped with ease hey scrub nerd pyros suck on these |
||
|
CaffeinePowered Mad Hatter Posts: 12,998 Joined: Mar 2008 |
08-01-2008, 01:41 PM
(08-01-2008, 11:57 AM)CopulatingDuck link Wrote: [quote author=Budr link=topic=1020.msg26694#msg26694 date=1217609216] Affecting a tongue-in-cheek tone when typing is serious business. I was only messing cos I've been pretty vocal about preferring stocks. Regarding the main point, I was more suggesting that, once #1 is all-custom, #2 could be a vanilla, stock-only server (possibly sans Granary). I really miss Badlands and Hydro. Plus I've only been on ctf_well once since the update and thought it was really nice but never gets played. [/quote] If anything, it would be sans ctf_well. I happen to like granary >, it's at least better than ctf_well action-wise imho. And from what I've seen, Fastlane is just a Hydro-looking version of Granary in that whomever gets the middle point in pub play always wins. [/quote] Fastlane isn't even a real fucking custom, the only reason it got distributed was because some website commissioned its creation made a deal with valve. Â Sig by Joel |
||
|
copulatingduck Following in Gordon's Footsteps Posts: 7,518 Joined: Apr 2008 |
08-01-2008, 01:44 PM
(08-01-2008, 01:41 PM)CaffeinePowered link Wrote: [quote author=CopulatingDuck link=topic=1020.msg26699#msg26699 date=1217609832] Affecting a tongue-in-cheek tone when typing is serious business. I was only messing cos I've been pretty vocal about preferring stocks. Regarding the main point, I was more suggesting that, once #1 is all-custom, #2 could be a vanilla, stock-only server (possibly sans Granary). I really miss Badlands and Hydro. Plus I've only been on ctf_well once since the update and thought it was really nice but never gets played. [/quote] If anything, it would be sans ctf_well. I happen to like granary >, it's at least better than ctf_well action-wise imho. And from what I've seen, Fastlane is just a Hydro-looking version of Granary in that whomever gets the middle point in pub play always wins. [/quote] Fastlane isn't even a real fucking custom, the only reason it got distributed was because some website commissioned its creation made a deal with valve. [/quote] I know that, I was refering to the "stock maps" I would be against having on a "vanilla" server. Vavle maeks shity marps Ripped like paper raped with ease hey scrub nerd pyros suck on these |
||
|
hawtpawkithero Lurker Posts: 445 Joined: May 2008 |
08-01-2008, 01:56 PM
Why can't we just do an all stocks server and an all customs server?
|
||
|
Budr Guest |
08-01-2008, 06:32 PM
(08-01-2008, 01:56 PM)hawtpawkithero link Wrote: Why can't we just do an all stocks server and an all customs server? This. Apparently I worded mine badly. |
||
|
rumsfald Guest |
08-01-2008, 10:14 PM
(08-01-2008, 06:32 PM)Budr link Wrote: [quote author=hawtpawkithero link=topic=1020.msg26718#msg26718 date=1217616965] This. Apparently I worded mine badly. [/quote] English as a second language? |
||
|
|