Your latency problems are over.

[Ianki]

nerd fight

[Blues]

[quote author=Versus-pwny- link=topic=2302.msg67618#msg67618 date=1235018452]
It saddens me that despite my best efforts to instruct and better you, some of you insist on finding new ways to fail.

We have sounded the alert and released a quick fix for an exploit that some unscrupulous players were using to wield items on invalid classes. I have considered an appropriate punishment for the good-for-nothings responsible for this horrendous breach of conduct. Death, of course - but death is too good for disappointments such as these. Instead, their unlockable items have been removed for a month.

To the majority of you who did not see fit to cheat, you have my congratulations: I await the countless other ways you will inevitably disappoint me in the future.

Yours,
TF Announcer

Lolwut?  exploiting a harmless exploit = punishment?

Besides a scout with a flame thrower, i can't think of many classes whose weapons can do much damage in the hands of another.  Might as well bar everyone who has gone civilian heavy from playing heavy for a month.

Has anyone been fucked by this?
[/quote]

Just banned this lovely fellow:

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL<STEAM_0:0:9414637>

Who was running around firing a blutsaugher, as a pyro, at
flamethrower speeds, reloading instantly. Made quite a spectacular
noise, and killed anything instantly.

Quite the opposite of "harmless". Anyone who got "fucked" by it deserved it fully. Wish they had instituted something like this for the people who crashed servers with the tampons and such.

[Ianki]

[quote author=Ianki link=topic=2302.msg67632#msg67632 date=1235023652]
[quote author=Versus-pwny- link=topic=2302.msg67618#msg67618 date=1235018452]
It saddens me that despite my best efforts to instruct and better you, some of you insist on finding new ways to fail.

We have sounded the alert and released a quick fix for an exploit that some unscrupulous players were using to wield items on invalid classes. I have considered an appropriate punishment for the good-for-nothings responsible for this horrendous breach of conduct. Death, of course - but death is too good for disappointments such as these. Instead, their unlockable items have been removed for a month.

To the majority of you who did not see fit to cheat, you have my congratulations: I await the countless other ways you will inevitably disappoint me in the future.

Yours,
TF Announcer

Lolwut?  exploiting a harmless exploit = punishment?

Besides a scout with a flame thrower, i can't think of many classes whose weapons can do much damage in the hands of another.  Might as well bar everyone who has gone civilian heavy from playing heavy for a month.

Has anyone been fucked by this?
[/quote]

Just banned this lovely fellow:

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL<STEAM_0:0:9414637>

Who was running around firing a blutsaugher, as a pyro, at
flamethrower speeds, reloading instantly. Made quite a spectacular
noise, and killed anything instantly.

Quite the opposite of "harmless". Anyone who got "fucked" by it deserved it fully. Wish they had instituted something like this for the people who crashed servers with the tampons and such.
[/quote]

I quoted this in the wrong thread :-( anyways, suck, huh

[at0m]

[quote author=at0m link=topic=2302.msg67324#msg67324 date=1234909336]
[quote author=Caffeine link=topic=2302.msg66081#msg66081 date=1234362743]
[quote author=HeK link=topic=2302.msg66075#msg66075 date=1234356652]
[quote author=zaneyard link=topic=2302.msg66053#msg66053 date=1234335517]
sorry hek, im fairly sure that everyone is making fun of these network cards. unless of course, your seriousness is a joke to that you are manically laughing at.

Even if Surf was joking about building a 'raid' of network cards, the practice is extremely common albeit not as easy as stated.
[/quote]

Man speaks the truth, you think servers have just one network jack 
[/quote]Its called 'load balancing'. Also, I don't understand why this thing doesn't have two ports and do it all by itself, that would be epic.
[/quote]

Load balancing is a complete science into it's self. A system with two network interfaces is not instantly a load balancer. Network arrogation is not load balancing, it's a form of redundancy.

An F5 makes a proper load balancer. I have a pair of BIG-IP balancers in one of my racks, they cost $30k each.
[/quote]Did it occur to you that I already know all of this, know that the only way it would be feasible would be to have a uC controlling everything on the NIC (like this one does(, and this is why I said it would be epic?

WHERE IS YOUR HIGH HORSE NOW?

</troll>

Seriously though, I'm an Electrical Engineer, and a huge computer nerd to boot. I know slapping two NICs into something doesn't instantly improve performance, but it would be awesome if they made a consumer-grade system that did it (What I just described : normal NICs :: Cisco : Linksys, think of it that way)

[Dave]

and i have a girlfriend who plays dead space on ps3 and shes not even fat.

[copulatingduck]

and i have a girlfriend who plays dead space on ps3 and shes on youtube.

[Dave]

[quote author=Dave link=topic=2302.msg67671#msg67671 date=1235054380]
and i have a girlfriend who plays dead space on ps3 and shes on youtube.

[/quote]

fuck you fleshlight.