debating neocon friends, halp plz

[Surf314]

rumsfald I need you on speed dial, will you by my mentor?

Also I've been debating people on net neutrality lately and I really can't understand why people see government = bad but corporate protectionism = good.

[If-I-Die-Its-Lag]

Bah, this person that Versus is talking about almost reminds me of a close friend of mine.

[beep beep diglett]

[quote author=Versus-pwny- link=topic=3777.msg119444#msg119444 date=1256451253]
"Unrtunately James, you don't get to demand the services of another individual just because you feel like you're entitled to it."

Except: Public defenders. Police. EMT's and ambulances. Firefighters. Coast guard and other military search and rescue when some trust fund twat gets their superspeedboat caught in a storm or who gets lost while hiking up mt. hood in shorts.
[/quote]
derpderpderp

also i thought that was kinda the point of taxes.. guess not

[Wedge]

rumsfald I need you on speed dial, will you by my mentor?

Also I've been debating people on net neutrality lately and I really can't understand why people see government = bad but corporate protectionism = good.

The problem is that's the wrong debate to be even having.  That's just what they're trying to twist it into.  The real debate is that these "rules" are just about keeping the internet how it already is, about NOT interfering with anything and about protecting the numerous corporations (and everyone else) that all gets to use the internet fairly.  I don't see how any idiot can argue hindering the innumerable amount of US businesses that make use of the internet is better than making a few incompetent telco's even richer.