Hello There, Guest! Register

Thinking about setting up a RAID on my pc...
s0lesurviv0r
N00b


Posts: 43
Joined: Jun 2008
#1
09-08-2008, 12:44 AM

Currently my pc has an 80gig(for vista and essential stuff) and a 250gig(games, media, pron etc).  But I've been contemplating taking the larger drive out and setting up a 2 drive raid(the egg is selling hitachi 500 gigs for 55 after rebate, WD640's look tempting also but a tad more expensive), then after transferring stuff from said drive to raid using it as an external (already bought an antec enclosure for cheap).  I'm wondering what I should know before I venture into this,  my 650 power supply won't buckle under the pressure will it, will transferring files be as easy as swapping the original drive in the enclosure and drag+dropping in windows?  Please enlighten me.
Reply
Mission Difficult
BRB, Posting


Posts: 1,771
Joined: Mar 2008
#2
09-08-2008, 12:46 AM

Do you want redundancy or higher bandwidth?


Reply
s0lesurviv0r
N00b


Posts: 43
Joined: Jun 2008
#3
09-08-2008, 08:30 AM

I'm going for bandwidth (um, that would be striping, right?) since I'll be using the 250gig as an external/backup.
Reply
zaneyard
Made with Whole Gainz (tm)
***

Posts: 6,930
Joined: Jun 2008
#4
09-08-2008, 09:58 AM

(09-08-2008, 08:30 AM)s0lesurviv0r link Wrote: I'm going for bandwidth (um, that would be striping, right?) since I'll be using the 250gig as an external/backup.
raid 0


(04-09-2013, 11:24 PM)Dr. Zaius link Wrote:well i'm not really understanding how it's faster internet. and like google just magically rolls outs this stuff and it's 100 times faster than my internet? why? that doesn't set off any alarms to anyone?

(11-07-2012, 11:15 PM)at0m link Wrote:I MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE OVERINDULGED ON RUM AND COKES AT OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE

THE BARTENDER WAS BRAGGING ABOUT BEING A LEFTY. I SAID I WAS A RIGHTY, BUT THAT I COULD UNDO A BRA WITH JUST MY LEFT HAND. ASKED HER IF THAT COUNTED AS BEING AMBIDEXTROUS. SHE SAID 'NOT REALLY'. tHEN HANDED ME ANOTHER DRINK.

I COUN THAT AS A WIN

CUBA LIBRE
Reply
CaffeinePowered
Mad Hatter
*******

Posts: 12,998
Joined: Mar 2008
#5
09-08-2008, 12:00 PM

(09-08-2008, 08:30 AM)s0lesurviv0r link Wrote: I'm going for bandwidth (um, that would be striping, right?) since I'll be using the 250gig as an external/backup.

Raid 0 = bandwidth
Raid 1 = redundancy
Raid 5 = both

Go for 5 if at all possible


[Image: caffsighl7.jpg]Â[Image: 1184299259221.gif]
Sig by Joel
Reply
HeK
Rotartsinimda
*******

Posts: 4,183
Joined: Jun 2015
#6
09-08-2008, 01:08 PM

(09-08-2008, 12:00 PM)CaffeinePowered link Wrote: Raid 0 = bandwidth
Raid 1 = redundancy
Raid 5 = both

Go for 5 if at all possible

There is also RAID 2, 3, 4, 6 and various levels of nested arrays.

RAID 2, 3, and 4 are pretty much pointless with RAID 5 and 6.

RAID 6 is similar to RAID 5 (striping with parity) but employs two copies of the parity information.
The idea is that when a RAID 5 array is in a degraded state, you suffer an immense performance hit.
Additionally, due to manufacturing tolerances, by the time a single drive fails in a array, the other drives are close to their limit as well. I've read that there is a 70% chance of a second drive failing while rebuilding a RAID 5 array, corrupting all data.
RAID 6 addresses that by giving you a two-disc failure tolerance.

Really with the price of discs, a nested RAID 1+0 is the best design.  It's basically a stripe of mirrors.
Reply
s0lesurviv0r
N00b


Posts: 43
Joined: Jun 2008
#7
09-08-2008, 03:02 PM

I thought you would need more than 2 drives to do RAID 5.
Reply
Mission Difficult
BRB, Posting


Posts: 1,771
Joined: Mar 2008
#8
09-08-2008, 03:06 PM

(09-08-2008, 03:02 PM)s0lesurviv0r link Wrote: I thought you would need more than 2 drives to do RAID 5.
You need at least 3.


Reply
copulatingduck
Following in Gordon's Footsteps


Posts: 7,518
Joined: Apr 2008
#9
09-08-2008, 03:20 PM

(09-08-2008, 12:44 AM)s0lesurviv0r link Wrote: Currently my pc has an 80gig(for vista and essential stuff) and a 250gig(games, media, pron etc).  But I've been contemplating taking the larger drive out and setting up a 2 drive raid(the egg is selling hitachi 500 gigs for 55 after rebate, WD640's look tempting also but a tad more expensive), then after transferring stuff from said drive to raid using it as an external (already bought an antec enclosure for cheap).  I'm wondering what I should know before I venture into this,  my 650 power supply won't buckle under the pressure will it, will transferring files be as easy as swapping the original drive in the enclosure and drag+dropping in windows?  Please enlighten me.

omg don't get hitachi's! idk what other people's experience with them is, but they're not nicked "hitachi deathstars" for nothing. Sad

Go with wd or seagate. Your data sounds like it's important to you, don't cheap out on one of the most important pieces of hardware. :-\

Also, just emphasizing the obvious: if you raid larger drives with smaller ones, it's going to look like you have [b]n of the smallest drives, ie the smallest drive is going to be your limiting factor.


Ripped like paper
raped with ease
hey scrub nerd pyros
suck on these
Reply
Mission Difficult
BRB, Posting


Posts: 1,771
Joined: Mar 2008
#10
09-08-2008, 03:33 PM

RAID's perform best if they're homogeneous, i.e. all drives are the exact same make and model. A heterogeneous RAID will work, but will take a performance hit. I also second Seagate drives. Had some bad experiences with Hitachi.


Reply
Dave
White Lighting - Extra 50% Free


Posts: 4,177
Joined: Jun 2008
#11
09-08-2008, 03:38 PM

(09-08-2008, 03:33 PM)Mission Difficult link Wrote: gay computers work better.

wat?


Reply
Mission Difficult
BRB, Posting


Posts: 1,771
Joined: Mar 2008
#12
09-08-2008, 03:46 PM

(09-08-2008, 03:38 PM)Dave link Wrote: [quote author=Mission Difficult link=topic=1364.msg37336#msg37336 date=1220906024]
gay computers work better.

wat?
[/quote]

Kind of like how ancient Greek armies would use the gay relationships between soldiers to boost their moral and bravery.


Reply
KorJax
BRB, Posting


Posts: 1,376
Joined: Jun 2008
#13
09-09-2008, 02:37 PM

(09-08-2008, 03:46 PM)Mission Difficult link Wrote: [quote author=Dave link=topic=1364.msg37337#msg37337 date=1220906288]
[quote author=Mission Difficult link=topic=1364.msg37336#msg37336 date=1220906024]
gay computers work better.

wat?
[/quote]

Kind of like how ancient Greek armies would use the gay relationships between soldiers to boost their moral and bravery.
[/quote]

Fuckin' hot


[Image: a731e9e08c48b218b111e3275e851e8e.gif]
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)